Tensile Testing:
A Gripping Story
Tensile
Testing:
A Gripping Story
Test & INspection
Tensile testing is varied in purpose and industry specific. The manner of holding the test specimen and applying the axis of tensile force is what makes the application unique and enables quality assurance at almost any point in any product’s lifecycle. By Moses Da Rocha
Test & INspection
H2 - Deck info goes here
By Paragraph Style Bolded
Being pulled in all directions
Physical testing is one essential step in the journey of any product from manufacturer to customer. In fact, it may occur at multiple stages from its design and development cycle through to production processes. For each business, the appropriate nature of the testing will vary. What defines being fit-for-purpose depends upon the role of the product in service and in some sectors that it has met industry regulations. In simple terms, functional performance is evaluated by the application of loading on the test piece and measuring the value at which something significant occurs.
What You Need to Know About Universal Testing
Moses Da Rocha, product and applications manager, PPT Group, explains the trends in universal testing.
![Q-Cast](https://cdn.vev.design/private/TrZjorIyzFVHDIUpGHunL0PSQdM2/images/RGoU4CVLwW/2100.png)
This loading may be a force or a torque, applied to pull something apart, push it together or twist it in either direction. Tensile testing is the big hitter—using a universal testing machine (UTM) to apply an axial force to stretch or pull the specimen apart. The exact loading is facilitated by how the test piece is gripped, and how this axial force interacts with it. The fixturing accessories fitted to the test frame control this interaction and perform the precise loading required.
Grasping the problem
Compression often holds things together, so securing the specimen is somewhat easier. Gripping objects that you are pulling apart securely and without slippage and in such a way as to not break them at the point of contact—which creates a stress raiser—is more of a challenge. In tensile testing, the fixturing involves an upper component attached to the frame’s moving ‘crosshead’ to not only hold the sample, but to perform the pull. The weight of the upper grip is a consideration as it will exert gravitational loading on the loadcell. A lower grip holds another part of the test specimen—in some cases the opposing end of a single component, in others another part of an assembly.
Two basic types of tensile test are broadly relevant; is the test specimen strong enough to resist breakage, or is it easy to use safely and efficiently?
Testing to failure
For destructive tests, the equipment must ensure the test specimen breaks at the point of interest and not at the point(s) where it is being held.
Measurement of Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS), toughness and break resistance are common objectives of destructive testing. These peak values are useful in the quality control (QC) environment (performed at point-of-manufacture) and in the R&D/NPD cycle for checking functional performance, particularly in safety-critical products which may be designed to support tensile loads in service.
AdCreative Missing.
(double-click to add)
![Pull Off Resistance Destructive Tensile Test](https://cdn.vev.design/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,q=82,h=1920/private/TrZjorIyzFVHDIUpGHunL0PSQdM2/image/jrEIiGA10v.jpg)
A classic test to failure (TTF) tensile test: A liquid-dispensing dip tube is loaded under tension until it detaches from its push-fit joint into the housing. A multi-claw grip is used to firmly grasp the spherical upper component and a self-tightening serrated-jawed wedge grip holds the lower end of the tube. The point of interest is the joint. The grips are solely required to hold fast and enable the tensile force at which detachment occurs to be measured.
Testing ease-of-use
Testing that something won’t break is vital, but so is testing that it will perform as intended. Products which end up in the hands of the customer must work efficiently and ergonomically. This often means that low force is ideal as children or the elderly or infirm may be the intended users. A tolerance range of values is usually the target to pass; below which the product may operate unsafely or accidentally and above which the user may not be able to operate it at all. In addition, more information than a simple peak value will indicate further levels of quality perceived by the user.
![Peel Effort Usability Tensile Test](https://cdn.vev.design/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,q=82/private/TrZjorIyzFVHDIUpGHunL0PSQdM2/image/k0EQZR7faW.jpg)
Ease-of-use functional test on cosmetics packaging: This tensile test implements a nominal axis of force angle as the tamper seal is peeled; which should need only a light load. The pinch grip replicates fingers, with enough grip surface area to avoid tearing the metal film at the grip contact point. The rigid glass container is held with foam pegs. A flexible container design may require a custom-molded fixture for an exact fit and vacuum operation to hold the part without deforming—which would interfere with the measured values.
Tactile attributes like feel, resistance and positive feedback can be quantified by graphical results delivered by the tensile test system’s software. Characteristics of the force curve—smooth, constant, rising, falling—can be correlated against benchmark quality objectives.
Testing for the senses
We have seen some universally implemented tensile tests in the wide-reaching domain of engineered physical products that are built to last and easy to use. The UTM (in tensile-testing configuration) can also be flavored to perform important quality tests as a scientific instrument in other diverse sectors. Food technologists are constantly challenged to design products that do break down, and the manner in which this happens is sometimes the single most important quality-acceptance factor. The sensory parameter ‘mouthfeel’ qualifies how food feels in the mouth when bitten or chewed. Texture terms such as tender, crunchy, ripe and fresh correlate to mechanical properties of the food—which is essentially a material and can be tested in the same way. Many texture tests utilize fixtures to apply compression (biting compresses the food to crush or slice) but the tensile test method also has direct relevance, not just in mouthfeel, but also replicating how it behaves during processing, preparation and packaging.
Food product texture testing: Tortilla tear resistance for fajita preparation and preservation—it must be soft, yet strong, to be manipulated without tearing. Additionally, the bread’s staling profile is determined by the packaging and its resealing effectiveness. The bread is put under tensile stress by applying compression from the UTM utilizing specialist food texture accessories of a spherical probe and an extensibility clamping fixture. Repeat testing of aged samples and comparing the results indicates how the specific product formulation retains its freshness (softness) and how effective the packaging is in prolonging shelf life.
Conclusions
The universal testing machine is just that—exactly what it says on the frame. With the addition of the right accessories, it can meet the quality assurance needs of almost any manufacturing industry, at all points in the product lifecycle. To do this, the frame just needs to hold the test specimen in the right manner—by means of the right grips and fixtures—and apply a tensile load. Or a compressive load, but that’s another story … one just as gripping.